The myths and reality of drug tests

Re-Publish this Article

<h1>The myths and reality of drug tests</h1><strong> Author: <a href='http://www.articleseen.com/profile_Kipling Collins.aspx'>Kipling Collins</a></strong><br /><p>Systematic drug testing got its start in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan issued Executive Order 12564. In doing so, he instituted mandatory drug-testing for all safety-sensitive executive-level and civil-service Federal employees. This law set a precedent for workplace drug-testing throughout the nation. And since then, many persons have been looking for ways to beat the tests. As a result, a number of myths and urban legends have emerged. In the attempt to shorten the detection times or mask the contents of their fluid specimens, a number of creative solutions have been offered, none of which work. One myth is that drinking vinegar will help you pass. This legend is one of the oldest ones in the history of drug testing, and is only partly true. Consumption of vinegar will lower the pH of the blood and urine, and drugs that contain amine groups (such as amphetamines) will be cleared out somewhat faster as their water solubility increases. But in the end, drinking vinegar is not a very reliable of beating a drug test. Another myth is that drinking urine will help you pass. However, there is no scientific evidence to substantiate this claim. Yet a third urban legend is that high doses of niacin will help you pass. This legend has been around for at least a decade. Niacin, also known as Vitamin B3, is speciously claimed by some to burn drug substances out of the body. While some Internet (and other) sources often claim that it works wonders, there is no scientific evidence that it has any effect. Very high doses can also cause adverse side effects. Laboratory-based drug testing is done in two steps. The first step is the screening test, which is applied to all samples. The second step is the confirmation test, and it is only applied to samples that test positive during the screening test. After a suspected positive sample is detected during screening, the sample is tested using a confirmation test. Samples that are negative on the screening test are discarded and reported as negative. The confirmation test in most laboratories is performed using mass spectrometry, and is precise but expensive. False positive samples from the screening test will almost always be negative on the confirmation test. Samples testing positive during both screening and confirmation tests are reported as positive to the entity that ordered the test. For workplace drug testing, a positive result is generally not confirmed without a review by a Medical Review Officer who will normally interview the subject of the drug test. It is important to remember that drug testing labs across the United States have increased their efforts to catch cheats who use urine-altering products. But many people who attempt to use such products will get flagged by the lab. Synthetic urine, also known as fake urine is a Quick Fix for detection avoidance. It is a laboratory made specimen which is designed with all the normal characteristics of the real thing. Labs cannot detect fake urine. However, one must be sure that the synthetic urine being used is the real thing. Using a quickfix synthetic urine is the best way to beat a drug test.</p><strong>About the Author:</strong><br />For more information about synthetic urine please visit <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.quickfixsynthetic.com">Quick Fix</a><p> Article Source: <a href='http://www.articleseen.com/Article_The-myths-and-reality-of-drug-tests_141172.aspx'> http://www.articleseen.com/Article_The myths and reality of drug tests_141172.aspx</a></p>

Article Source : http://www.articleseen.com/Article_The myths and reality of drug tests_141172.aspx

Keywords : quick fix, fake urine, synthetic urine, quickfix synthetic,

Category : Business : Business