Biochemistry and Man's Ancestors (Which One)

Re-Publish this Article

<h1>Biochemistry and Man's Ancestors (Which One)</h1><strong> Author: <a href='http://www.articleseen.com/profile_Steve-0.aspx'>Steve-0</a></strong><br /><p>According to the eminent British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking (who spoke the following quote in a recent interview), "heaven is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark." And God is not real, that's also according to him. I understand that he's an atheist and evolutionist, but he's also sadly lacking the facts in his bias against God. The fact remains that Hawkings has faith, not in God, but in evolution. While anyone is certainly entitled to believe whatever they want, here are some facts that may disturb Stephen's misplaced faith in this man-made theory. Biochemistry and man's ancestors; which one is it? 1) Blood precipitation tests indicate that the chimpanzee is man's closest relative. 2) Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is man's relative. 3) Cholesterol level tests indicate that the garter snake is man's closest relative. 4) Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man's closest relative. 5) On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man's closest relative. Here's what some other people have said on the subject of evolution. "The more one studies paleontology (the fossil record) the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone," records evolutionist Louis T. More. "Evolution is a time-honored scientific tenet of faith," says Professor David Allbrook from the University of Western Australia. "Evolution is a fairy tale for adults," states Biologist and Doctor Duane Gish. "Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that's unthinkable." Sir Arthur Keith, Evolutionist. "One cannot assume that man is made over anthropoid ape of any sort, for much of the available evidence is strongly against that assumption," according to William L. Straus, Jr. "It is clear that the doctrine (teaching) of evolution is directly antagonistic to that of creation. Evolution, if consistently accepted makes it impossible to believe the Bible (the sacred scriptures)," as per Thomas Henry. "Neither evolution nor creation can be either confirmed or falsified scientifically," that's according to Doctor N.Heribert-Nilsson. "The evolutionary assumptions by their nature are not capable of experimental verification," affirms evolutionist G.A. Kerkut. Scripture Thought "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3-4 </p><strong>About the Author:</strong><br />Biochemistry, Blood Precipitation Tests, Milk Chemistry, Cholesterol Level Tests, Tear Enzyme Chemistry, Stephen Hawkings<p> Article Source: <a href='http://www.articleseen.com/Article_Biochemistry-and-Mans-Ancestors-(Which-One)_97666.aspx'> http://www.articleseen.com/Article_Biochemistry and Man's Ancestors (Which One)_97666.aspx</a></p>

Article Source : http://www.articleseen.com/Article_Biochemistry and Man's Ancestors (Which One)_97666.aspx

Keywords : Biochemistry, Blood Precipitation Tests, Milk Chemistry, Cholesterol Level, Tear Enzyme, Chemistry, blood, bean, snake, evolution, Ha,

Category : Reference and Education : Science